Factual accuracy
Compared with 0.87 for prompt-only generation.
Findings of EMNLP 2025
A RAG and reinforcement-learning framework that adapts health-misinformation corrections to a reader's health-literacy level.
The problem
A single explanation cannot serve every reader equally well. Existing counterspeech systems often ignore health literacy, producing responses that may be accurate but too technical, too simple, or poorly aligned with the intended audience.
Methodology

Contributions
Controlled-Literacy, a framework that combines level-aware retrieval with reinforcement learning.
A hybrid reward balancing readability alignment and simulated reader preference.
MisinfoLiteracy, a dataset of 440 health-misinformation posts paired with literacy-controlled counterspeech.
Cross-level evaluation showing that readers prefer responses matched to their intended literacy level.
Evaluation
Compared with 0.87 for prompt-only generation.
Compared with 0.41 for the prompt-only baseline.
Closer readability alignment than the 2.74 baseline.
Highest when the response matches the reader's level.